They told me not to.
By the time my third evaluation came around, I had changed classroom rules, consequence systems, reward systems, and everything else about 50 times. Not only that, but I had not one, but four different crazy reward systems going all the time: Stars per period which were awarded for academic achievements; Student of the week which was done per period and had like 4 different reward options; Points awarded each class for every 5 minutes they went without being assholes (rarely happened); Marble jars also awarded for behavior per period.
All in all, it was a goddamn nightmare.
The individual rewards were based on XP, which were good except that my particularly shy kids, the ones who also happened to be really well behaved, would never get rewarded because they hate reading in class so would never get XP. I tried to remedy this by occasionally forcing them to read or do something in class, but it certainly didn't breed happiness. This also meant that students who talked over other students, read aloud very often, and were particularly vocal, even if they were disruptive the other 50% of the time, they would still rack up XP and get to buy candy, quiz and homework passes, and bonus points, while the good kids were left in the cold.
In addition to all this, my referrals were getting up to at least one a day, and on my worst days I could clock 5. I knew from every time I had gotten advice that changing every time it got hard was not the way to go, and in reality every time I switched something around I was only screwing myself over even more. And when that observation came around again, and my mentor was sitting across from me again, I heard the same advice again, "If you keep changing, the students don't know what's expected and they'll never get better. You have to stick with what you have and don't change anything anymore, no matter how bad it gets."
That being said, and known, I still couldn't push through with what I had. I couldn't keep up, and the kids were all noticing that no one system was actually effective, so they didn't care. I had no way to systematically reward the kids who were consistently good, write-ups and ISS and Alt School didn't deter the increasingly rough behavior, and when one of my Seniors said to me one afternoon, "Just wait till the flowers start bloomin' Ms. T, shit's only gonna get crazier," I decided I had to do something.
In addition to all this, my referrals were getting up to at least one a day, and on my worst days I could clock 5. I knew from every time I had gotten advice that changing every time it got hard was not the way to go, and in reality every time I switched something around I was only screwing myself over even more. And when that observation came around again, and my mentor was sitting across from me again, I heard the same advice again, "If you keep changing, the students don't know what's expected and they'll never get better. You have to stick with what you have and don't change anything anymore, no matter how bad it gets."
That being said, and known, I still couldn't push through with what I had. I couldn't keep up, and the kids were all noticing that no one system was actually effective, so they didn't care. I had no way to systematically reward the kids who were consistently good, write-ups and ISS and Alt School didn't deter the increasingly rough behavior, and when one of my Seniors said to me one afternoon, "Just wait till the flowers start bloomin' Ms. T, shit's only gonna get crazier," I decided I had to do something.
Over Spring Break, I went into my classroom and streamlined like a madwoman. I cleaned out all the junk in my room (over 50 tri-fold Reading Fair boards, good God) and took down every system I had in place. No more stars, no more marbles, no more points, no more students of the week. I took it all down. I took down my consequences and my rewards posters, but left my rules up. And here's what went up instead:
![]() |
| 3 magnetic white boards, 50 circle magnets, and 50 labels each with a student's name on them, color coded per period. |
I had planned on having a system like this next year, but I couldn't wait any longer. In this system, everybody starts in the center (this photo was taken at the end of the week, so they've moved around quite a bit). When students are consistently good (i.e. start their bellringer immediately and silently, follow directions, give great answers) they move up on the system, eventually getting to "Role Model" level and staying there. However, when students create disruptions, don't follow directions, come in unprepared, come in tardy, or talk out of turn, they move down a level. The students who move down in levels can move back up by not getting any more consequences for the remainder of the period, or starting their bellringer immediately and quietly the next day.
Which brings me to my next great idea that I never thought would work: I instituted a "Raise Hands' rule. I never liked this rule when I started, and if you remember back then I had these class "modes" that we used to see when we could raise our hands and when we could discuss out loud. Yet again with my inconsistency and terrible management, this never worked. What I do now is the beginning of class is always raising hands, and then we have designated discussion time I say "You can call out now, but if we interrupt each other or you talk over me, we will go back to raising hands."
This entire things has gone SHOCKINGLY well. Now I will say this: I am only doing this with my Juniors. My Seniors at this point are a lost cause, and really they're so focused on getting out that they're really not bad discipline problems except for about 3 of them, and no system will save me from those ones. But the Juniors I will have again next year, and they will know the system and know what to expect, and so far it is ridiculous how successful it's been. Here's a breakdown:
- It rewards the kids who are consistently good. It is easy in these schools to think that "not getting written up" is a reward. Also some teachers believe that we "shouldn't reward students for being quiet, sitting still, and doing their work. That's what they're supposed to do. You get rewarded for being outstanding, not doing the bare minimum of what's expected." I see where this argument comes from, but for me it's not so much a reward, as a thank you. When I give kids on "Role Model" level cookies on a Friday, it's kind of a reward for them, but mainly it's a thank you from me. It's my way of saying, "You know what, in this situation, at this place, you could have turned out like these other assholes. You didn't. Thanks for not being an asshole." These kids were regularly getting left behind and ignored, because all my energy was spent on the disrupters. These "good" students would also often get "taken down" by the disrupters in the class because for them there was no reason to act right. They knew that the two or three rough kids would prevent the whole class from getting rewarded, so they gave up. I see now when those few kids start to act up, the class doesn't get hijacked because the other kids know that they have a reward coming. The effect is just amazing.
- It rewards kids who act well, but struggle academically. Another issue I was having is the idea that "The reward for the well-behaved students is good grades." This is a great idea if your well-behaved students are also high-leve achievers. But what if you have three well-behaved, very engaged students, but they still can't read? Then not even good grades are their rewards. They really do get left behind in the worst way. This system has kept those students engaged too, and I've seen an improvement in their work!
- It takes away the reward aspect of XP if a student is disruptive. This was more of a serious problem than I can even explain unless you've been in my class. Answering questions, reading off the board, reading out loud, sweeping the classroom, and other helpful activities get you XP points in my classroom, which you can redeem for chips or candy on Fridays, Quiz and
Homework passes, bonus points on tests and essays, and special privileges like bringing food to class or listening to music. I liked this system, except what was happening was that for some students they are highly participatory, but also highly disruptive. I also had the particularly disruptive students stealing XP on a regular basis, or bullying other students out of them. This resulted in kids who wouldn't pay attention in class, cause disruption during tests or quizzes, or disengage because "I got enough XP in here I never have to take a quiz or test again!" This also meant that kids who paid attention, got good grades, and never disrupted, but also weren't confortable reading or participating as often, had virtually no XP and even if they had them, they didn't need them.
But in the new system, if you're on the lower three levels, you can't use your XP. Your money is of no use here! If a student is on the bottom they can't use their XP for bonus points, treats, or privileges. This has totally changed the way that XP works, and the way that my students view them. Some of them complained, but most of them kind of understood. More importantly, I could see my consistently good students felt much better knowing that they weren't being left in the cold.
4. It has cut my referrals down to virtually none. This is going to sound insane, but I have not written up a single Junior since this system started. I know that sounds like a pretty dramatic change, but it's true. My referrals have all but disappeared. Even my principal has noticed! Now some of this is due to some new procedures I put in as well, but I know that a good part of it is this system. In my second period especially, two boys who have been the most consistent problems all year have turned into model students, all motivated by getting to "Role Model" level. They are always making sure I'm looking at them so they can stay at the top, and when they get rowdy and I have to move them down, they immediately straighten up and watch the board like hawks till they move back up. It's outstanding!
I have also done Interactive Notebooks and new procedures for my Juniors which is helping a lot, but I love how this system is working. It has also made it so much easier for me track. I have struggled all year with tracking consequences. I've tried seating chart trackers, iPhone apps, Google Docs, labels, pretty much everything, but I just couldn't stay consistent. With all the systems I had it was too much for me to handle and I kept giving up. This system has worked now for about a month, and I have been consistent with it so far. It is a lot easier for me to keep up with. I just write arrows if they move up or down a level, and then I have codes I circle (Z for sleeping, C for calling out, D for disruptive, R for Referral, which I haven't circled yet! Yay!).5. It prevents consistent disrupters from disengaging or giving up. In the past, another issue I was having is that if a student was given sort of the "last-call" of consequences, like getting a zero daily grade, getting referred, calling the office, they would give up and act even worse. They knew they were as far down as they could go, and they were going to take everyone down with them. I wanted a way for these students to work themselves out of the "last call." In this system, even if they reach the bottom (except the "Off The Board" level, these students are not allowed back on board until I speak to a guardian, but this has only happened once), they are able to straighten up during the period and get back on track.
There's one boy in 2nd period that I still struggle with on a daily basis, but I really really love him so it's a labor of love. Most of the time if he gets off track (he has severe ADHD that manifests in some pretty loud, bouncing, running, cussing ways), I stay on him with reminders and verbal cues and he is usually able to redirect and get back on track with the class. On the other hand, there are two students 8th
period (a boy and a girl) for whom I assure you it is NOT a labor of love, but rather a labor of necessity to keep myself from physically assaulting either of them. For these two, this system is mostly lost. They don't care for the rewards or the consequences, but these are the students who haven't cared about these things all year. But even for the "terrible two", in one of them (the girl) I can see a glimmer of change. A few times now she has stopped herself from calling out, standing up, or otherwise causing disruption because she is so close to "Outstanding" and she doesn't want to screw it up. In fact, this past Friday she raised her hand (which she never remembers to do) and asked to come speak to me. She came to me and told me that she had gotten her bellringer done quietly, even though the boy next to her (the other half of the terrible two) was trying to get her to talk and give him her cell phone. She said she tried really hard and thought she should get moved up to Role Model. She seemed really genuine, and I obliged. Now, she didn't last up there very long, as about halfway through the period she threw her notebook across the room and declared that she hated me, but like I said, it's a *glimmer.* The boy just spends the entire period yelling and cussing and complaining, I'll let you know when I see a *glimmer* from that one. Eesh.
6. It makes me feel better. I know this one might seem weird, but I had a lot of guilt knowing that quiet, engaged, hard-working students were being largely ignored and unrewarded in my classes. It broke my heart when I could see them losing interest, or getting mad or frustrated when disruptive kids not only
kept them from learning and getting what they wanted and needed out of my class, but they were getting rewarded with bonus points and treats just because they were loud! I wanted to say I was sorry so many times and never had the chance. I even went so far as to send my high-level kids to the library a few days a week to do independent work because I hated to subject them to the horrible class because it was my fault they were horrible. This way, even on the worst days, I know and they know that they will have a reward, and the students who are disrupting won't. It gives me more confidence and them more faith. It just makes me feel better, which is turn gives me more energy, which makes me work better, and blah blah blah it's great.
***
I'll write more next time about the notebooks I'm using because I know that those plus the new procedures have helped A TON, but this entry is already ten million years long. All in all, I am so proud of myself! I didn't listen to everyone's advice not to change, but this time it worked out for me. And I get to test out my new system for two months before next year, so I can get it perfect. I am considering doing it next year where everyone starts back on "Ready To Learn" every Monday, instead of just staying where they are and moving each day. Thoughts?











